How the chapter club works
- On the
Tuesday before your chapter-club meeting, Išll give you and everyone else
a list of concepts and general questions relating to your topic. You
should spend the week trying to become familiar with the concepts and
working out answers to the questions, but donšt worry if there are things
you donšt quite understand or questions you canšt quite answer. Thatšs
good. Just be ready to toss these to the rest of the group.
- While
preparing for your presentation, use the Stern textbook as well as any
other resources you find useful. The Stern book is good but imperfect, and
I suspect Išll be posing plenty of questions whose answers are nowhere in
Stern.
- On the
Monday before your chapter-club meeting, youšll meet with me for about
15-30 min. Wešll go over anything you want to go over, but mostly wešll
talk about how to lead discussion, your ideas on how to present the
material, etc.
- Your
chapter-club meeting will be on a Tuesday. You'll be completely in charge
of leading discussion, but I'll be there to help you out. You may make a
regular presentation of the material, you may play Socrates and teach by
asking carefully chosen questions, or you may come up with something else.
The important thing is that you encourage lots of informal conversation
about the concepts and questions included in your topic, and that everyone
feel that she has a clear understanding by the end of the day.
- On
Thursdays, I'll go over any concepts and questions that are left over from
the previous Tuesday, and we'll discuss the week's take-home assignment.
- You'll
be graded on your participation in the chapter-club discussions. It's fine
if you have to miss one or two discussions, as long as you find out from
someone (not me) what was discussed. Absence from more than two
discussions will probably affect your grade.
- Your
participation grade is based on how often you talk, how well prepared you
seem to be (for each discussion, not just for the one you lead), and
whether you appear to be trying to push the discussion's boundaries beyond
the presented material. If you're a shy person, you'll have to speak
through your shyness to get a perfect participation grade.
A few things to keep in mind from my experience with journal clubs
The chapter club is modeled on journal clubs, those
reading-and-discussion groups ubiquitous among grad students and professors
everywhere. Journal clubs vary in quality, but I feel pretty confident making a
few generalizations:
- Bad
journal clubs are macho my-brain-is-larger-than-yours competitions among their participants. In these
clubs, the only questions people dare asking are so obscure or difficult
or highfalutin' that their purpose can only be to say, "Look how smart I
am," or, "Look how stupid that person is." We won't do that.
- In
good journal clubs, everyone feels free to ask elementary -- even
stupid -- questions.
- Ask
questions not only to clarify points for yourself, but also to make sure
that all the important points have been articulated clearly for the
group. Think of the conversation as being about saying out loud
everything that needs to be said, and saying it well.
- If
one or two people are annoying the rest of the group by seemingly
refusing to understand some basic point, accept the challenge to
articulate that point even more clearly. That is, be a professor as well
as a colleague.
- But
what about smart, interesting questions? A good journal club ends up
asking a lot of questions and drawing a lot of connections that go beyond
the scope of the presented material. If all you get out of the chapter
club is the same collection of facts which you could've gotten just from
reading the textbook, then the club has completely failed you.
- Think
about and then bring up
connections between what's being presented and concepts and questions
raised elsewhere in the course, in other courses, or in other parts of
your life.
- Maybe
something being presented will seem to contradict something you
understand from elsewhere. Bring it up. Scientists believe that nature must be consistent, and resolving
apparent inconsistencies is consistently a source of deeper
understanding.
- Like everything
else at BMC, the success of the club depends on your active participation.
You'll get knowledge and understanding from the club, but you must also
contribute your own knowledge and understanding.
- Read
up on the topic, even if you're not the one who's presenting. Have your
own understanding of the concepts and your own answers (or near-answers)
to the questions.
- Speak.
You're taking without giving if you don't speak upand anyway you won't
learn as much as you think you will.
Take-home assignments
- On
most Thursdays I'll give you a take-home assignment. Usually it'll be a
somewhat open-ended question or a set of measurements or observations to
make of plants around campus. Often I'll ask you to draw (yes, with a
pencil or something) some plants or plant parts which you'll find on
campus or nearby. Sometimes I'll ask you to work with a partner, and sometimes
I'll ask you to work by yourself.
- We'll
spend most of the time on Thursdays discussing the take-homes as a
groupwhat the point is, what some useful strategies might be, what might
be some pitfalls.
- I'll
give you specifics for each take-home, but in general you'll turn in
either a set of measurements or a paragraph or two describing what you did
and what you found. If you worked with a partner, both you and your
partner must turn in separate reports or measurement-tables.
- Take-home
assignments are due one week from when they are assigned. There will be no
extensions, but you may turn yours in up to one week late with a one-point
penalty. I won't accept anything more than one week late.
- Turn
in your assignments on paper, not by emailing things to me. Hand them to
me in person or slip them under my office door.
- You
don't have to do the assignment that is due the Thursday after your scheduled chapter-club meeting. Just turn
in a note reminding me that you're exempt that week.
- Take-home
assignments receive 4 points if excellent, 3 points if pretty good, 2
points if adequate, 1 point if bad, 0 points if nonexistent or more than a
week late. I'll ignore the worst non-zero grade when calculating your
final grade.
Independent projects
- At the
end of the semester you'll give me a 5-7 pp. paper answering a question of
your choice. That's 5-7 pp. double-spaced Times 12-point with one-inch
margins, and not counting illustrations and references.
- The
question need not have anything directly to do with anything we've done in
class, but it must have something to do with plants. The topic may be
scientific, social-scientific, or humanistic.
- The
question must not have a purely factual answer, like "What genes have been
implicated in early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana?" Nor may it be a purely subjective question,
like "Which flowers are pretty?" The question must require critical
thinking and some scholarly research on your part.
- I
discourage but do not forbid you from choosing a question that requires
you to do your own experiments or theoretical models.
- I
would like to approve your question before you begin work on the paper. I
encourage you to have your question approved by Fall Break.
- The
last two days of class, you'll present your project to the group. The
paper itself is due at 5:00 pm, Friday, Dec. 10. Hand it to me or slip it
under my office door. Do not e-mail it to me. I will not accept a late
paper without an extension from your dean.
Botaniblog
- We'll
all be contributing to a course blog called the botaniblog. The botaniblog's
URL is http://bmcbotany.typepad.com/,
and you'll receive information via email on how to use Typepad (http://www.typepad.com/) to post.
- The
botaniblog is viewable by anyone in the world with WWW access. To protect
everyone's privacy, everyone (except me) will be posting under a
pseudonym. Your pseudonym will be the scientific species name of a plant
or algal species of your choice.
- You
must post at least once every week. If you miss weeks, you cannot make it
up by posting two in the next week.
- Your
posts may be of three types: news posts, observation posts, and principles
posts.
- A
news post connects something discussed in class or elsewhere on the
botaniblog to some current news item.
- An
observation post connects something discussed in class or elsewhere on
the botaniblog to a botanical observation you make on campus or in your
travels. For these posts, please consider uploading scans of drawings.
- A
principles post either proposes a general botanical principle or
discusses one that's already been proposed on the botaniblog.
i. A
botanical principle is a useful rule which explains or describes otherwise separate-seeming
botanical phenomena. Example: organ longevity is positively related to the energetic
cost of its building material.
ii. To
propose a principle, you must articulate it and give at least two examples.
iii. To
discuss a proposed principle, you may argue for it, argue against it, or refine
it. Grounds for arguing against a principle include uselessness, narrowness,
and wrongness.
- Your
botaniblog grade depends only on your posting at least once a week. It won't
depend on the quality of your post, as long as it's really a principles
post, a news post, or an observation post.
Exams
- There
will be two exams. The midterm will take place during class on Thursday,
Oct. 21. The final will be a self-scheduled exam, to be taken during Exam
Week.
- Both
exams are open-textbook, open-note, and both exams will be pretty easy.
- The
material covered by the exams is the material from the chapter-club discussions.
What we learn from the take-home assignments and from independent projects
will not be examined.
Other things
- The recommended
textbook is KR Stern, S. Jansky and JE Bidlack. 2003. Introductory Plant Biology, 9th ed. McGraw Hill, Boston. Don't
read it. Instead, use it as a
reference and starting point. The material covered in the course overlaps
with the material covered in the book, but the book covers thing which we
won't touch, and we'll discuss things that aren't even mentioned in the
book.
- I'll
set official office hours after discussing times with the group. You can
always e-mail me (twong@brynmawr.edu)
to set up a special time. Or, stop by my office. If my door is open, I'm
probably free to talk. My office is Park 251.
- If you
need accommodation of any learning differences, please have Stephanie Bell,
the Coordinator of Accesibility Services, provide me with the necessary
paperwork. Stephanie's office is in Canwyll House, and her phone extension
is 7351. If you need an exam accommodation, I need the paperwork by Sept.
30.
- Your final
grade will be 25% final, 25% midterm, 25% take-home assignments, 20%
participation in chapter-club discussions, and 5% botaniblog entries. The
chapter-club discussion that you lead counts as much as any other
chapter-club discussion.
- Of
course, the usual rules of academic honesty apply: don't cheat or
plagiarize, cite sources responsibly, check with me if you're unsure about
anything. If you witness another student apparently engaging in academic
dishonesty, the BMC Honor Code obliges you to confront her about it.
- Practice
safe computing. I won't accept any excuses that have to do with crashed
computers or problems with e-mailing or uploading files, so back things up
often and in more than one physical location.
- Botany
is all about observing and describing nature. Keep your eyes open as you
walk around campus or in your travels. If you see something interesting
somewhere, jot down a description or make a quick sketch so you can share
it with the rest of us.
Last updated 8/31/2004 by Ted Wong.