The End of the War: Spartan Hegemony and the Rise of Thebes
Vicissitudes
of Athens
Oligarchic Dissatisfaction in Athens:
Losses under the democracy
Peisander and the hetaireiai
Phrynichus and Antiphon
Alcibiades and the Lure of Persian Aid
The governments of the Four Hundred and the Five
Thousand
brief oligarchic coup by the Four Hundred
(Peisander, Phrynichus) 411
Fleet at Samos creates democratic government in
exile with Alcibiades
Cleophon vs. Theramenes - the Five
Thousand in Athens
Chance for peace after Hellespontine victories
– Cyzikos 410
Triumphal return of Alcibiades 407
Alcibiades cast out again after Antiochus' failure
at Notium 406
Athenian victory at Arginusae - generals sentenced
to death 406
Sparta
wins the War
Athenian fleet destroyed at Aegospotami 405
Athens besieged
grain supply from Black Sea cut
Athens surrenders in 404
Oligarchy
in Athens: From the Four Hundred
in 411 to the Thirty Tyrants in 404/3
Spartan oligarchic regimes - decarchies
The Thirty Tyrants: Critias, Charmides, Theramenes
Execution of Theramenes and the Thirty's reign of
terror
Thrasybulus and Athenian exiles in Thebes capture
the fort of Phyle
Battle for the Piraeus; Critias, many leaders of
the Thirty killed
Lysander's influence wanes – King Pausanias
vs. Lysander in Sparta
Spartan King Pausanias permits democracy with
amnesty for oligarchs at Eleusis
Spartan
Hegemony
Spartan harmosts and decarchies in Greek cities
– Lysander's influence
Spartan support of Cyrus against Artaxerxes ends
in disaster 399
Tissaphernes, satrap of Caria, cracks down on
Ionian cities - war with Sparta
King Agesilaos campaigns in Asia Minor 396-4
Corinthian War against Sparta by Greek alliance
395-387
Defeat of Spartan fleet at Cnidus by Conon and
Persians 395
King's Peace of 387/6 leaves Sparta in control,
breaks up Greek alliances
The
Rise of Thebes
Spartan dissolution of Mantinea and Chalkidike
Anti-Spartan alliance between Thebes and Athens
Liberation of Thebes from pro-Spartan oligarchs
379/8
Pelopidas and the Sacred Band
Theban takeover of Boeotia - Orchomenos, Phokis
Peace Conference 371 - Thebes refuses to make
peace with Sparta
Battle of Leuctra 371 - Thebes defeats Sparta
Theban
Hegemony
Theban Hegemony in the South -
liberation of Messene
Arcadian League - Megalopolis
Theban Hegemony in the North -
Pelopidas aids Thessalians (Aleudae of Larissa)
against Alexander of Pherai
Alexander II of Macedon requests Theban aid
against rivals
Thebes builds fleet to try for sea power in North
Aegean
Crumbling of Theban Hegemony
Athenian alliance with Sparta against Thebes in
Peloponnese
Internal Disputes in Arcadian League
Battle of Mantinea 362 - Death of Epaminondas
after victory
Causes of Failure for Thebes
TIMELINE
404 Athens
surrenders to Sparta, Thirty Tyrants installed
401-399 Expedition
of Cyrus against Artaxerxes;
retreat
of the Ten Thousand Greek mercenaries
(Xenophon's Anabasis)
396-4 Spartan
King Agesilaos campaigns in Asia Minor
395 Corinthian
War - alliance of states against Sparta
386 King's
Peace between Persia and Greek states
379-8 Liberation
of Thebes from Spartans
378-7 Formation
of Second Athenian League
375-370 Jason
of Pherai leads Thessaly until assassinated by nephew Alexander
371 Thebans
defeat Spartans at Battle of Leuctra
370-361 Thebans
invade the Peloponnese
367 Dionysios
I dies, Dionysios II takes over Syracuse
364 Thebans
destroy Orchomenos, main rival in Boeotia;
Thebans
defeat Thessalians - death of Pelopidas
362 Thebans
defeat Spartans and allies at Mantinea - death of Epaminondas
359 Philip
becomes King of Macedon
Xenophon, Hellenica
III.3
But
Diopeithes, a man very well versed in oracles, said in support of Leotychides
that there was also an oracle of Apollo which bade the Lacedaemonians beware of
the lame kingship. Lysander, however, made reply to him, on behalf of
Agesilaus, that he did not suppose the god was bidding them beware lest a king
of theirs should get a sprain and become lame, but rather lest one who was not
of the royal stock should become king. For the kingship would be lame in very
truth when it was not the descendants of Heracles who were at the head of the
state. [4] After hearing such arguments from both claimants the state chose
Agesilaus king.
When Agesilaus had been not yet a year
in the kingly office, once while he was offering one of the appointed
sacrifices in behalf of the state, the seer said that the gods revealed a
conspiracy of the most terrible sort. And when he sacrificed again, the seer
said that the signs appeared still more terrible. And upon his sacrificing for
the third time, he said: "Agesilaus, just such a sign is given me as would
be given if we were in the very midst of the enemy." There-upon they made
offerings to the gods who avert evil and to those who grant safety, and having
with difficulty obtained favourable omens, ceased sacrificing. And within five
days after the sacrifice was ended a man reported to the ephors a conspiracy,
and Cinadon as the head of the affair. [5]
Readings:
Plato
VIIth Letter, Republic (Book VIII, selections)
Isocrates
to Phillip
philosophic history
assignment
Look at a general shift in the political and
economic structure of Greek society, a shift in the political and economic
structure of Greece in the period of Greek history known as "the rise of
the city-state" from about 750 BC to the hegemony of Macedon at the end of
the fourth century (338). How does this shift play out in Athens up to and
during Plato's lifetime?
How is the political shift linked to the crisis of
values Plato explores in the Republic?
How do Gorgias, Critias, Euripides, and Aristophanes' Clouds express the
same crisis of values and political shift? Compare Plato's reaction to these earlier authors.
How do Isocrates' address to Philip and Plato's
interactions with Dion and Dionysius of Syracuse try to resolve the political
problems of Greece? What
differences in the situation create the different outcomes?
Theban Sacred Band
Plato
Symposium 178d-179a
Let me
then say that a man in love, should he be detected in some shameful act or in a
cowardly submission to shameful treatment at another's hands, would not feel
half so much distress at anyone observing it, whether father or comrade or
anyone in the world, as when his favorite did; [178e] and in the selfsame way
we see how the beloved is especially ashamed before his lovers when he is
observed to be about some shameful business. So that if we could somewise
contrive to have a city or an army composed of lovers and their favorites, they
could not be better citizens of their country than by thus refraining from all
that is base [179a] in a mutual rivalry for honor; and such men as these, when
fighting side by side, one might almost consider able to make even a little
band victorious over all the world. For a man in love would surely choose to have
all the rest of the host rather than his favorite see him forsaking his station
or flinging away his arms; sooner than this, he would prefer to die many
deaths: while, as for leaving his favorite in the lurch, or not succoring him
in his peril, no man is such a craven that Love's own influence cannot inspire
him with a valor that makes him equal to the bravest born;
Plutarch,
Life of Pelopidas
Gorgidas,
according to some, first formed the Sacred Band of three hundred chosen men, to
whom, as being a guard for the citadel, the State allowed provision, and all
things necessary for exercise: and hence they were called the city band, as
citadels of old were usually called cities. Others say that it was composed of
young men attached to each other by personal affection, and a pleasant saying
of Pammenes is current, that Homer's Nestor was not well skilled in ordering an
army, when he advised the Greeks to rank tribe and tribe, and family and family
together, that-
"So
tribe might tribe, and kinsmen kinsmen aid."
but that he should have joined lovers
and their beloved. For men of the same tribe or family little value one another
when dangers press; but a band cemented by friendship grounded upon love is
never to be broken, and invincible; since the lovers, ashamed to be base in
sight of their beloved, and the beloved before their lovers, willingly rush
into danger for the relief of one another. Nor can that be wondered at since
they have more regard for their absent lovers than for others present; as in
the instance of the man who, when his enemy was going to kill him, earnestly
requested him to run him through the breast, that his lover might not blush to
see him wounded in the back. It is a tradition likewise that Iolaus, who
assisted Hercules in his labours and fought at his side, was beloved of him;
and Aristotle observes that, even in his time, lovers plighted their faith at
Iolaus's tomb. It is likely, therefore, that this band was called sacred on
this account; as Plato calls a lover a divine friend. It is stated that it was
never beaten till the battle at Chaeronea: and when Philip, after the fight,
took a view of the slain, and came to the place where the three hundred that
fought his phalanx lay dead together, he wondered, and understanding that it was
the band of lovers, he shed tears and said, "Perish any man who suspects
that these men either did or suffered anything that was base."
It was not the disaster of Laius, as the
poets imagine, that first gave rise to this form of attachment amongst the Thebans,
but their lawgivers, designing to soften whilst they were young their natural
fierceness, brought, for example, the pipe into great esteem, both in serious
and sportive occasions, and gave great encouragement to these friendships in
the Palaestra, to temper the manners and characters of the youth. With a view
to this they did well, again, to make Harmony, the daughter of Mars and Venus,
their tutelar deity; since, where force and courage is joined with gracefulness
and winning behaviour, a harmony ensues that combines all the elements of
society in perfect consonance and order. Gorgidas distributed this Sacred Band
all through the front ranks of the infantry, and thus made their gallantry less
conspicuous; not being united in one body, but mingled with so many others of
inferior resolution, they had no fair opportunity of showing what they could
do. But Pelopidas, having sufficiently tried their bravery at Tegyrae, where
they had fought alone and around his own person, never afterward divided them,
but, keeping them entire, and as one man, gave them the first duty in the
greatest battles. For as horses ran brisker in a chariot than singly, not that
their joint force divides the air with greater ease, but because being matched
one against the other emulation kindles and inflames their courage; thus he
thought brave men, provoking one another to noble actions, would prove most
serviceable, and most resolute, where all were united together.


Places
to Know:
|
Amphipolis |
Argos |
Athens |
|
Corinth |
Lesbos |
Leuctra |
|
Mantinea |
Messenia |
Orchomenos |
|
Pherae |
Phocis |
Samos |
|
Sparta |
Thebes |
Thespiae |