|


The ability to review well-known facts and discern patterns others have
not seen is fundamental to scholarship, but the urge to pioneer an interpretation
sometimes overwhelms the weight of the evidence. The historical records
surrounding Joan of Arc provide ample data to be shaped and re-shaped
by enthusiasts and partisans, and there are plenty of questions which
are essentially unanswerable except by faith: What were Joan's voices?
How can you explain her military skill? Why did she succeed where experienced
warriors had failed? It is no surprise, then, to find books and articles
proposing explanations of Joan and her mission that
most scholars find untenable.
The
oldest argument which is in direct contradiction to the evidence suggests
that Joan was the bastard of Isabeau of Bavaria and Louis, Duc d'Orleans
- the half-sister of Charles VII. Charles favored her because of their
kinship, and her ability to command armies was innate because of her heritage.
First published by Pierre Caze (left) at the beginning of the 19th century,
the theory was promoted again in 1932 by Jacoby in Le Secret de Jeanne
d'Arc. This explanation claims that Isabeau's child Joan, born in
1407, did not die immediately as reported, but was spirited away to be
raised by Jacques Darc and Isabelle Romée. The idea has re-appeared
as recently as 1961, in the publication of Operation Shepherdess: The
Mystery of Joan of Arc (by André Guérin and Jack Palmer
White).
Proponents
of spiritualism have long suggested that Joan was
a medium, able to hear messages from higher spheres. Léon Denis
(translated here by Arthur Conan Doyle) felt that he himself was sensitive
to such communications, and that Joan had spoken directly to him several
times during his investigation of her life. Joan was known to appear at
séances in the nineteenth century - her appointment
to meet a "French gentleman" was recorded in photo #35 (at right),
taken by Frederick A. Hudson, England's most prominent spirit photographer.
Joan's psychic ability is also discussed in the article in Fate
magazine; the
10 proofs of the article's title are predictions Joan made which came
true.
Joan was accused at her trial of witchcraft. Margaret Alice Murray agreed
with this judgment and, mixing in conspiracy theory, argued that Joan
was an active participant in a secret, lower class, "old"
religion. In this worldview, both Joan and her followers consider her
God incarnate, but the figures generally identified as St. Michael and
St. Catherine are human co-religionists. Rouen was a suitable town for
her execution, as it had a"living tradition of human sacrifice".
Murray, a pioneering female archeologist, was a specialist
inEgyptian hieroglyphics and Egyptology.
|
|