This page provides an overview of the items in the dossiers for candidates who are being reviewed for reappointment and/or promotion. The first section describes the elements of a typical dossier. Candidates prepare two sets of materials: one set is for the department chair (and the departmental review), the other set is for the Committee on Appointments. It is important to note, however, that--for certain types of reviews--dossiers can be more streamlined. The second section--a table--specifies the dossier requirements for each type of reappointment review.
Elements of a typical dossier
The candidate is to submit these to the Office of the Provost for the outside reviewers and the Committee on Appointments:
Additions to the dossier:
Candidates may add materials to their dossiers at any point in the review process and may communicate to the Provost or the President, in writing, any additional information which they feel to be pertinent to their review. Such material may be considered as part of the review. Manuscripts and published materials will be returned to the candidate. In preparing the dossier, and thereafter throughout the reappointment process, the candidate may consult both a former member of the Committee on Appointments designated by the Committee, usually the outgoing Chair, and the Chair of the Faculty, who serve as advisors on reappointment and promotion procedures.
The candidate is to give these to the department chair:
NB: With the exception of published books, materials submitted as part of the dossier and sent to outside reviewers will not be returned.
Dossier requirements for specific types of reappointment review:
Continuing Non-Tenure Track positions
Initial reappointment in tenure track positions
Terms in which tenure becomes effective
Departmental review of Associate Professors
College reviews of Associate Professors with tenure.
| | |||
| Item | Brief description | Number of Copies | Remarks |
| Curriculum vitae | Include educational background, employment history, publications, grants, awards, and other pertinent professional activities, and work in progress | 8 | |
| Self-assessment | Include goals and plans for the next few years for teaching, research, service, and other relevant information | 8 | |
| Courses | Provide a list of courses taught and their syllabi; indicate which courses are additions to the curriculum | 8 | |
| Student papers | Provide a list of honors papers,and if pertinent,theses supervised/in progress | 8 | To be done if this is part of the candidate's responsibility |
| Teaching evaluations | At least those of the last three years | 1 (one) set of originals | Submit in the original envelopes |
| NB. The items that follow are optional for CNTT candidates unless requested by the Committee on Appointments. | |||
| Publications, including other records of research and/or performance |
| Books: 1 copy Other items: 2 copies | |
| Other | Grant proposals or other items of professional work suitable for review, such as
| 2 | |
| Outside reviewers' names | At least six names | one list | Requested at the discretion of the Committee on Appointments; see the guidelines for outside review. If requested, 6 additional copies of all documents except teaching evaluations and books will be required. |
| Back to the top. | |||
| | |||
| Item | Brief description | Number of Copies | Remarks |
| Curriculum vitae | Include educational background, employment history, publications, grants, awards, talks given at other institutions and at meetings of professional societies and work in progress | 8 | |
| Self-assessment | Include goals and plans for the next few years for teaching, research and service | 8 | |
| Courses | Provide a list of courses taught and their syllabi; indicate which courses are additions to the curriculum | 8 | |
| Student papers | Provide a list of honors papers, M.A. & Ph.D. theses supervised/in progress | 8 | |
| Teaching evaluations | At least those of the last three years | 1 (one) set of originals | Submit in the original envelopes |
| Publications |
| Books: 1 copy Other items: 2 copies | |
| Grants | Copies of any grant proposals in progress | 2 | |
| Leave proposal | Copies of the Junior Faculty Research Leave proposal | 2 | |
| Back to the top. | |||
| | |||
| Item | Brief description | Number of Copies | Remarks |
| Curriculum vitae | Include educational background, employment history, publications, grants, awards, talks given at other institutions and at meetings of professional societies and work in progress | 16 | |
| Self-assessment | Include goals and plans for the next few years for teaching, research and service | 16 | The self-assessment is sent to outside reviewers. If a candidate wishes to send a distinct self-assessment to outside reviewers, she or he should clearly identify the internal and external self-assessments. |
| Courses | Provide a list of courses taught and their syllabi; indicate which courses are additions to the curriculum | 16 | |
| Student papers | Provide a list of honors papers, M.A. & Ph.D. theses supervised/in progress | 16 | |
| Teaching evaluations | At least those of the last three years | 1 (one) set of originals | submit in the original envelopes |
| Publications |
| Books: 1 Articles: 16 Preprints: 1 | Candidates should indicate which unpublished MSS s/he does not wish outside reviewers to see. |
| Grants | Copies of any proposals in progress | 16 | Candidates should indicate which grant proposals s/he does not wish outside reviewers to see. |
| Outside reviewers' names | At least six names | one list | See guidelines. |
| Back to the top. | |||
| | |||
| Item | Brief description | Number of Copies | Remarks |
| Curriculum vitae | Include educational background, employment history, publications, grants, awards, talks given at other institutions and at meetings of professional societies and work in progress | 1 | |
| Self-assessment | Include goals and plans for the next few years for teaching, research and service | 1 | This 2-3 page document is for the professors in the department or program. |
| Teaching evaluations | All since the last review years | 1 (one) set of originals | Submit in the original envelopes |
| Leave proposals | Copies of all sabbatical leave proposals since the last review | 1 (one) set of originals | |
| Back to the top. | |||
| | |||
| Item | Brief description | Number of Copies | Remarks |
| Curriculum vitae | Include educational background, employment history, publications, grants, awards, talks given at other institutions and at meetings of professional societies and work in progress | 16 | |
| Self-assessment | Include goals and plans for the next few years for teaching, research and service | 16 | This will be sent to outside reviewers, but candidates may designate a part of the self-assessment which should not be sent out. |
| Courses | Provide a list of courses taught and their syllabi; indicate which courses are additions to the curriculum | 16 | |
| Student papers | Provide a list of honors papers, M.A. & Ph.D. theses supervised/in progress | 16 | |
| Teaching evaluations | At least those of the last three years | 1 (one) set of originals | submit in the original envelopes |
| Publications |
| Books: 1 Articles: 16 Preprints: 1 | Candidates should indicate which unpublished MSS s/he does not wish outside reviewers to see. |
| Grants | Copies of any proposals in progress | 16 | Candidates should indicate which grant proposals s/he does not wish outside reviewers to see. |
| Outside reviewers' names | At least six names | one list | See guidelines. Candidates whose work has recently received external review need not seek new evaluations from outside readers. |