Course: POLS265 Political Data Analysis (Paradigms and Perestroika)
 Semester: Fall 2006
Time:  MW 10:00-11:30 am
Room: Dalton 6

Instructor: Sanford Schram

Office: Social Work 212

Hours: T 10-11:30 am or by appointment

Description: This course invokes renewed emphasis in the discipline of Political Science on methodological pluralism. In that spirit, it introduces students to a variety of different ways in which to gather data in order to make knowledge claims about politics. Data are construed broadly to encompass qualitative information as well as quantitative. Methods range from historical contextualization to experiments, surveys, field studies and even interpretations of texts and images. The course surveys major methodological approaches to studying politics with an eye toward enhancing the capacity to decide when and how such approaches might work best given the subjects under study. The course starts with the idea that the topic should determine the methods used rather than the other way around. It ends with consideration of how triangulation, as in the case of employing multiple methods to study the same topic, can help strengthen the resulting knowledge claims. A series of exercises provide opportunities for students to begin to practice different research methods and to assess their value in the production of political knowledge.

 Texts Available for Purchase at the College Bookstore:

 

Earl Babbie, The Basics of Social Research, 3rd Edition (Wadsworth Group, 2005).
Shulamit Reinharz, Feminist Methods in Social Research (Oxford University Press, 1992).

Course readings other than the texts available at the bookstore can be accessed electronically at the course webpage on Blackboard at: http://blackboard.brynmawr.edu.

Assignments:
Students are required to complete 5 short research exercises over the course of the semester. On five occasions during the semester, instructions will be distributed in class for students to choose each time from among a number of methods to engage in an exercise related to research and data analysis.

Evaluation:
Students’ performance in the course will be evaluated as follows:

Class participation           25%

5 Data Exercises             75% (15% each)

TOTAL                         100%

Course Outline:

PART I: General Themes

 

9/4 Introduction
 

 

9/6 Paradigms and Perestroika: Methodological Pluralism in Political Science Today

D.W. Miller, "Storming the Palace in Political Science: Scholars Join Revolt Against the Domination of Mathematical Approaches to the Discipline, Chronicle of Higher Education, September 21, 2001. Click here.

Sanford F. Schram, “Return to Politics: Perestroika and Postparadigmatic Political Science,” Political Theory, 31 (Dec 2003): 835 - 851. Click here.

 

Ian Shapiro, “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It,” Political Theory, 30 (August 2002): 596-619. Click here.

 

 

9/11 Structuring Research from a Positivist Perspective of Explaining Causality

 

Babbie, Chapters 1-3.

 

Robert A. Pape, “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political Science Review 97, 3 (August 2003): 343-361. Click here.

 

James D. Fearon, “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (January 1991): 169-195. Click here.

 

First Assignment

 

 

9/13

 

Babbie, Chapters 4-6.

Barbara Harff, “No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955,” American Political Science Review 97, 1 (February 2003): 57-73. Click here.

 

 

9/18 Structuring Qualitative Research from an Interpretivist Perspective of Understanding Meaning

 

Babbie, Chapter 10.

Reinharz, Chapter 1-2.

 

 

9/20

 

Ann Chih Lin, "Bridging Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Qualitative Methods," Policy Studies Journal 26, 1 (1998): 162-80. Click here.

Todd Jick, "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action," Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 4 (1979): 602-11. Click here.

 

 

PART II: Data Collection and Analysis Exemplified

 

9/25 Quantitative Analysis: Exemplifying Problems in Prediction and Causation

 

Joe Soss, Sanford F. Schram, Thomas P. Vartanian, and Erin O’Brien, "Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution," American Journal of Political Science 45 (2001): 378-95.  Click here.
 

Janet C. Gornick and Marcia K. Meyers, “Lesson-Drawing in Family Policy: Media Reports and Empirical Evidence about European Developments,” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 3,1 (June 2001): 31-57. Click here.

 

Walter Korpi and Joakim Palme, “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95,” American Political Science Review 97, 3 (August 2003): 425-446. Click here.

 

 

9/27 Predicting Political Behavior through Survey Research

 

Babbie, Chapter 9.

 

Reinharz, Chapter 4.

 

 

10/2

 

Donald Kinder and Nicholas Winter, "Exploring the Racial Divide: Blacks, Whites and Opinion on National Policy," American Journal of Political Science 45, 2 (April, 2001): 439-56. Click here.

 

Mark Peffley, Mac Avery, and Jason Glass, "Race Matters: The Impact of News Coverage of Welfare Reform on Public Opinion," Race, Welfare, and the Politics of Reform, Sanford Schram, Joe Soss, and Richard Fording, eds. (Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003). Click here.
 

 

10/4 In-Class Data Analysis on Quantitative Data

 

UC-Berkeley Social Science Data Archive

 

UMich ICPSR SETUPS on Voting Behavior

 

US Census Bureau's Current Population Survey

 

 

 

10/9

 

Second Assignment

 

 

10/11 Predicting Political Behavior through Experimental Research

 

Babbie, Chapter 8.

 

Reinharz, Chapter 5.                                                                                                                                  

 

Edward Schatz and Irwin J. Schatz, “Medicine and Political Science: Parallel Lessons in Methodological Excess,” PS: Political Science & Politics 36, 3 (July 2003): 417-422. Click here.

 

 

FALL BREAK

 

 

10/23 Experimental Research Exemplified

 

Tali Mendelberg, "Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign," Public Opinion Quarterly 61, 1 (1997): 134-57. Click here.
 

Devah Pager, “The Mark of a Criminal Record,” The American Journal of Sociology 108, 5 (March 2003): 937-76. Click here.

 

Third Assignment

 

 

10/25 Neo-Institutionalisms

 

Adam Przeworski, “Institutions Matter?” Government and Opposition 39, 4 (September 2004): 527-40.  Click here.

 

Theda Skocpol, "Why I am a Historical-Institutionalist," Polity 28 (Fall 1995): 103-6. Click here.

 

10/30 Historical-Institutionalism and Macrosocial Inquiry: Contextualizing Comparisons

 

Theda Skocpol and Margaret Somers, "The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry," Social Revolutions in the Modern World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 72-95.  Click here.

 

Ellen M. Immergut, "The Roles of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden," Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, S. Steinmo, K. Thelen,and F.  Longstreth, eds. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 57-89.  Click here.
 

 

11/1 The Logic of Case Studies

 

Reinharz, Chapter 9.

 

James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), pp. 1-52. Click here.

 

David Laitin, “Book Review--Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 30, 1 (1999) 177-179. Click here.
 
Timothy J. McKeown, “Case Studies and the Limits of the Quantitative Worldview,” in Henry Brady and David Collier eds. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), pp. 139-170. Click here. 

                              

 

11/6 Interpretive Analysis and Field Studies: The Case of Ethnography

 

Reinharz, Chapter 3, 7.

 

Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz, “From the Inside Out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research,” PS: Political Science & Politics 37, 2 (April 2004): 417-422. Click here.

 

Marc Howard Ross, “Culture and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis,” Comparative Politics: Rationality, Structure, and Culture, Mark Irving Lichtbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 42-80. Click here.

 

 

11/8

Jonathan Lieberson, “The Silent Majority,” New York Review of Books 28, 16 (October 22, 1981). Click here. (Review of James C. Scott, Moral Economy of the Peasant and Samuel Popkin, The Rational Peasant).

Lloyd I. Rudolph and Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, “Engaging Subjective Knowledge: How Amar Singh’s Diary Narratives of and by the Self Explain Identity Formation,” Perspectives on Politics 1, 4 (December 2003): 681-694. Click here.

 

 

11/13 Interpretive Analysis and Field Studies: Going In-depth, Interviewing and Participant Observation

 

Joe Soss, “Talking Our Way to Meaningful Explanations: A Practice-Centered View of Interviewing for Interpretive Research.,“ in Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, eds., Interpretation and Method (Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 2005), Chapter 6. Click here.

 

Howard S.Becker, "Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation," American Sociological Review 23 (1958): 652-660. Click here.

 

Richard F. Fenno, Jr., "The Political Scientist as Participant Observer," Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation (Berkeley: Institute for Governmental Studies, 1990), pp.  55-94. Click here.


 

11/15

 

Ralph Huitt, "The Outsider in the Senate: An Alternative Role," American Political Science Review 55 (1961): 566-75. Click here.

Mary Hawkesworth, “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions,” American Political Science Review 97, 4 (November 2003): 529-550. Click here.
 
 

 

11/20 Unobtrusive Measurement

 

Babbie, Chapter 11.

 

Reinharz, Chapter 8.

 

11/22 Unobtrusive Measurement: The Example of Content Analysis

 

Sanford F. Schram and Joe Soss, "Success Stories: Welfare Reform, Policy Discourse and the Politics of Research," Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 577 (September 2001): 49-65. Click here.

 

Lisa D. Brush, "Worthy Widows, Welfare Cheats; Proper Womanhood in Expert Needs Talk about Single Mothers in the United States, 1900 to 1988," Gender & Society, 11 (December 1997): 720-46. Click here.

 

Fourth Assignment

 

 

11/27 Diagnosing Visual Culture: The Case of Picture Theory

 

W.J.T. Mitchell, Picture Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp. 35-82. Click here.

 

11/29 The Visual and the Spatial

 

Wahneema Lubiano, "Black Ladies, Welfare Queens, and State Minstrels: Ideological War by Narrative Means," Race-ing Justice, En-gendering Power, Toni Morrison, ed. (New York: Pantheon, 1992), pp. 323-64. Click here.

 

Sanford F. Schram, "Putting a Black Face on Welfare: The Good and the Bad," Praxis for the Poor: Piven and Cloward and the Future of Social Science in Social Welfare (New York: New York University Press, 2002), Chapter 5. Click here.

 

Edward Soja, “Writing the City Spatially,” City, 7, 3 (November 2003): 269-80. Click here.

  

 

12/4 Examining Discursive Practices: Deconstruction and its Others

 

Martha S. Feldman, Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995), Selections. Click here.

 

Jennifer Dodge, Sonia M. Ospina, and, Erica Gabrielle Foldy,Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry,” Public Administration Review 65, 3 (May 2005): 286-300. Click here.

 

Sanford F. Schram, “Deconstructing Dependency: Heading Toward a Counter Discourse,” Welfare Discipline: Discourse, Governance, and Globalization (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005), Chapter 6. Click here.

 

 

12/6 Deconstruction Redux

 

Bonnie Honig, “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic,” American Political Science Review 85, 1 (March 1991): 97-113. Click here.

 

Jacques Derrida, “Declarations of Independence,” New Political Science 15 (1986): 7-15. Click here.

 

Fifth Assignment

 

 

PART III: Is Methodological Multivalence Possible and Desirable?

 

12/11 Beyond Paradigm: Methodological Pluralism, Beyond Triangulation, and Mixed Methods Research

 

Evan S. Lieberman, “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research,” American Political Science Review, 99, 3 (August 2005): 435-452. Click here.

 

Reinharz, Chapters 11.

 

 

12/13

 

Summation